Fix the Debt! 

Whilst working on my blog for my MA in Media, Campaigning and Social Change, I have also been commenting and reading various other blogs by students on the course. All of which are very interesting and contain examples of many campaigns from across the UK and world that outline a struggle against social norms, situations and for the improvement of conditions and so forth.

Further, after a recent lecture on Professionalism and Ethics in campaigning, it was noted that there was no unifying Institute of Campaigning or any professional body to improve ad share best practice, professional values, ethical practice and other things such as training.

Fix the debt!

It therefore made me fascinated to read about a campaign called “Fix the Debt“, a US based campaign that seeks to drive and create awareness for the huge US deficit. So far, so good.
The reason it piqued my interest is that it again reminded me that campaigning is seemingly never straightforward. Say we had such a professional body called the Institute of Campaigning, one would assume that any member would be campaigning for positive social change.

However, on closer inspection it transpires that this Fix the Debt campaign is actially backed by large US corporates who actually are more interested in their own profits. An article pointed this out, read more here, and explained the hypocracy of the whole campaign.

This raises a smaller, but equally as important question if we consider who is behind and who buys in the campaign (simply, the stakeholders) , as they too might believe or consider this campaign tthe provide social benefit or improvement of conditions. And rightly so, who is to say that they are wrong?

Final thoughts

My conclusion on this is simply that though professionalism was discussed in our lecture in early December on the MA course, campaigns such as Fix the Debt in the US demonstrate how “social change” could mean something different in certain contexts. This, therefore, poses a problem if we were ever to form a national or internation Institute of Campaigning – where do we stop ethically? Who do we include? Should people be excluded?

Further Note

*This blog has been written as part of my Media, Campaigning and Social Change MA (Part time) at the University of Westminster, for more information about this course please view:


One thought on “Fix the Debt! 

  1. Thank you Alex, this post is great reminder that “social change” can mean different things to different actors and its not always progressive. At times, you may have get into bed with organisations or actors that are not aligned with your values. Do we take a by an means necessary approach or maintain the moral high ground? What’s the point of the moral high ground if you’re left standing there alone having achieved no visible and concrete change? But then again there’s the argument that let’s say leading by example and taking the moral high ground could lead to societal transformative. But then again it’s easy to say this if you’re advocating for others and its not you that whose life will be directly affected by campaign aims. I guess I’m saying I don’t think there can be, or should be, a formal institute for campaigning, not only because of the difficulties and internal struggles that may arise around who will runs it and how. But also because in campaigning I think credibility, honesty, trustworthiness and authenticity are very good ways of encouraging participation. Mmmm perhaps I can blog about this too.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s